Costs and attorney’s charges pursuant to RCW 19.86.080; and 2 e. Costs and attorney’s fees pursuant to RCW 19.86.080; and 13 e. Disgorgement and restitution pursuant to RCW 19.86.080; 26 b. Disgorgement and restitution pursuant to Virginia Code § 59.1-9.15(a); Eight b. Disgorgement and restitution pursuant to RCW 19.86.080; 10 b. 12 490. Plaintiff States are entitled to, and must be awarded, a treatment of disgorgement 13 in opposition to Google for any unjust profits that Google acquired on account of the unlawful conduct 14 described herein which is not earnings derived from natural persons (or others underneath state laws 15 the place applicable) that’s subject to restoration beneath parens patriae authority. Three 492. Plaintiff States are entitled to, and should receive, injunctive relief towards Google 4 as applicable, including structural treatments, to treatment Google’s unlawful conduct and to 5 forestall comparable or related future unlawful conduct. 9 489. Plaintiff States aren’t seeking damages particularly on behalf of any state 10 companies in this lawsuit. §§ 1 and 2, and the State 25 legal guidelines recognized in Plaintiff States’ eighth cause of action; 26 b.
3 four PRAYER FOR RELIEF 5 488. Plaintiff States are entitled as parens patriae to get well, and needs to be awarded, 6 treble damages on behalf of their natural individual residents pursuant to the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. Injunctive and other equitable relief pursuant to Virginia Code § 59.1-9.15(a) and 9 (d); 10 c. 23 Code § 47-18-17; 24 b. Damages for customers pursuant to Utah Code §13-11-17; 20 b. This declare asserting thirteen violations of the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act is brought by the Utah Division of 14 Consumer Protection by the Utah Attorney General’s Office performing as their counsel. Accordingly, Plaintiff States pray that the 6 Court adjudge and decree that Google, all individuals acting on its behalf or beneath its course or 7 control, and all successors thereto, be enjoined from: Eight a. §§ 1 and 2, and the State laws identified in Plaintiff States’ eighth trigger of 19 action; 20 f. §§ 1 and 2, and the State laws recognized in 10 Plaintiff States’ eighth cause of action; 11 d. §§ 1 and 2, and the State 23 legal guidelines identified in Plaintiff States’ eighth cause of action; and 24 g.
§§ 1 and 2, and the State laws recognized in Plaintiff 2 States’ eighth trigger of motion. §§ 1 and 2, and the State laws four identified in Plaintiff States’ eighth trigger of action; 5 c. §§ 1 and 2, and the State laws identified in Plaintiff 14 States’ eighth cause of motion; 15 e. 21 491. Plaintiff States pray that the Court adjudge and decree as follows: 22 a. Other cures, including interest, because the court docket might deem applicable under the 14 facts and circumstances of the case. Other remedies, including curiosity, as the courtroom could deem applicable under the three info and circumstances of the case. Other cures as the court may deem acceptable under the facts and 26 circumstances of the case. Our sales workforce is ready to advise you on the Subaru Liberty worth, 2017 model and to reply another questions you might have. I feel the answer is Yes, since Eonon aftermarket Car DVD Players has more functions, reminiscent of first it is Android 4.4.4 OS & Superior Quad-Core CPU which will deliver you Fastest Response and Peak Performance. Under the phrases of that deal, Apple will let builders use communication methods like electronic mail to inform clients about fee strategies accessible outside of iOS apps, and it will develop the price factors that developers can provide for apps, in-app purchases, and subscriptions.
Apple has lengthy allowed what it calls “reader” apps (like Netflix, Kindle, Spotify, Audible, or Dropbox) to invoice users outside of Apple’s common in-app purchase technique (during which Apple takes 15 to 30 percent of subscription or buy revenue). That Section 4.5 of Google’s Developer Distribution Agreement, which prohibits 6 builders from using “Google Play to distribute or make out there any Product 7 that has a function that facilitates the distribution of software functions and eight games to be used on Android gadgets exterior of Google Play,” violates Sections 1 and 9 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. Prohibiting builders from using Google Play to distribute apps or app shops that 19 may be used to facilitate the distribution of apps on Android gadgets outdoors of 20 Google Play; 21 d. 15 475. Google is a “supplier” engaged in “consumer transactions” pursuant to Utah Code 16 §§ 13-11-3(2), (6). 17 476. Utah seeks all treatments out there beneath Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act 18 together with, without limitation, the following: 19 a. Code § 47-18-8; 27 e.
Post was generat ed with GSA Con te nt Gener ator DEMO!